Annotation Interface EnableCaching
<cache:*> XML namespace. To be used together
with @Configuration
classes as follows:
@Configuration
@EnableCaching
public class AppConfig {
@Bean
public MyService myService() {
// configure and return a class having @Cacheable methods
return new MyService();
}
@Bean
public CacheManager cacheManager() {
// configure and return an implementation of Framework's CacheManager SPI
SimpleCacheManager cacheManager = new SimpleCacheManager();
cacheManager.setCaches(Arrays.asList(new ConcurrentMapCache("default")));
return cacheManager;
}
}
For reference, the example above can be compared to the following Framework XML configuration:
<beans>
<cache:annotation-driven/>
<bean id="myService" class="com.foo.MyService"/>
<bean id="cacheManager" class="cn.taketoday.cache.support.SimpleCacheManager">
<property name="caches">
<set>
<bean class="cn.taketoday.cache.concurrent.ConcurrentMapCacheFactoryBean">
<property name="name" value="default"/>
</bean>
</set>
</property>
</bean>
</beans>
In both of the scenarios above, @EnableCaching and
<cache:annotation-driven/> are responsible for registering the necessary Framework
components that power annotation-driven cache management, such as the
CacheInterceptor and the
proxy- or AspectJ-based advice that weaves the interceptor into the call stack when
@Cacheable methods are invoked.
If the JSR-107 API and Framework's JCache implementation are present, the necessary
components to manage standard cache annotations are also registered. This creates the
proxy- or AspectJ-based advice that weaves the interceptor into the call stack when
methods annotated with CacheResult, CachePut, CacheRemove or
CacheRemoveAll are invoked.
A bean of type CacheManager
must be registered, as there is no reasonable default that the framework can
use as a convention. And whereas the <cache:annotation-driven> element assumes
a bean named "cacheManager", @EnableCaching searches for a cache
manager bean by type. Therefore, naming of the cache manager bean method is
not significant.
For those that wish to establish a more direct relationship between
@EnableCaching and the exact cache manager bean to be used,
the CachingConfigurer callback interface may be implemented.
Notice the @Override-annotated methods below:
@Configuration
@EnableCaching
public class AppConfig implements CachingConfigurer {
@Bean
public MyService myService() {
// configure and return a class having @Cacheable methods
return new MyService();
}
@Bean
@Override
public CacheManager cacheManager() {
// configure and return an implementation of Framework's CacheManager SPI
SimpleCacheManager cacheManager = new SimpleCacheManager();
cacheManager.setCaches(Arrays.asList(new ConcurrentMapCache("default")));
return cacheManager;
}
@Bean
@Override
public KeyGenerator keyGenerator() {
// configure and return an implementation of Framework's KeyGenerator SPI
return new MyKeyGenerator();
}
}
This approach may be desirable simply because it is more explicit, or it may be
necessary in order to distinguish between two CacheManager beans present in the
same container.
Notice also the keyGenerator method in the example above. This allows for
customizing the strategy for cache key generation, per Framework's KeyGenerator SPI. Normally,
@EnableCaching will configure Framework's
SimpleKeyGenerator
for this purpose, but when implementing CachingConfigurer, a key generator
must be provided explicitly. Return null or new SimpleKeyGenerator()
from this method if no customization is necessary.
CachingConfigurer offers additional customization options:
that provides a default implementation for all methods which
can be useful if you do not need to customize everything. See CachingConfigurer
Javadoc for further details.
The mode() attribute controls how advice is applied: If the mode is
AdviceMode.PROXY (the default), then the other attributes control the behavior
of the proxying. Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through
the proxy only; local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way.
Note that if the mode() is set to AdviceMode.ASPECTJ, then the
value of the proxyTargetClass() attribute will be ignored. Note also that in
this case the spring-aspects module JAR must be present on the classpath, with
compile-time weaving or load-time weaving applying the aspect to the affected classes.
There is no proxy involved in such a scenario; local calls will be intercepted as well.
- 从以下版本开始:
- 4.0
- 作者:
- Chris Beams, Juergen Hoeller
- 另请参阅:
-
CachingConfigurerCachingConfigurationSelectorProxyCachingConfigurationcn.taketoday.cache.aspectj.AspectJCachingConfiguration
-
可选元素概要
可选元素修饰符和类型可选元素说明Indicate how caching advice should be applied.intIndicate the ordering of the execution of the caching advisor when multiple advices are applied at a specific joinpoint.booleanIndicate whether subclass-based (CGLIB) proxies are to be created as opposed to standard Java interface-based proxies.
-
元素详细资料
-
proxyTargetClass
boolean proxyTargetClassIndicate whether subclass-based (CGLIB) proxies are to be created as opposed to standard Java interface-based proxies. The default isfalse. Applicable only ifmode()is set toAdviceMode.PROXY.Note that setting this attribute to
truewill affect all Framework-managed beans requiring proxying, not just those marked with@Cacheable. For example, other beans marked with Framework's@Transactionalannotation will be upgraded to subclass proxying at the same time. This approach has no negative impact in practice unless one is explicitly expecting one type of proxy vs another, e.g. in tests.- 默认值:
- false
-
mode
AdviceMode modeIndicate how caching advice should be applied.The default is
AdviceMode.PROXY. Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through the proxy only. Local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way; a caching annotation on such a method within a local call will be ignored since Framework's interceptor does not even kick in for such a runtime scenario. For a more advanced mode of interception, consider switching this toAdviceMode.ASPECTJ.- 默认值:
- PROXY
-
order
int orderIndicate the ordering of the execution of the caching advisor when multiple advices are applied at a specific joinpoint.The default is
Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE.- 默认值:
- 2147483647
-